Charlotte H, Author at Exquisite Timepieces
iconHome Blog / Archives for Charlotte H

Author: Charlotte H

rolex explorer 2 review

Is the Rolex Explorer 2 Worth the Hype?

Charlotte H

April 29, 2025

The Rolex Explorer 2 is one of those watches that has a cult following, and for good reason. It’s rugged and instantly recognisable, carrying that unmistakable Rolex DNA.

It was originally designed in 1971 for spelunkers (that’s just a fancy word for cave explorers), with the intention of helping adventurers distinguish between day and night in total darkness. But let’s be real, most people you’ve spotted wearing it have never once set foot in a deep underground cave.

That’s because over the years, the Rolex Explorer II has evolved from a niche tool watch into something much bigger. With its bold 24-hour bezel, independent GMT hand, and no-nonsense steel construction, it’s now a go-to choice for travelers, collectors, and basically anyone who just appreciates a cool, solid timepiece.

But after all these years, is the Rolex Explorer 2 still worth the hype? Is it well and truly a watch deserving of adventuring or is it just another luxury sports watch riding on its own legend?

A Quick History of the Rolex Explorer

Rolex Explorer 2 History

The Rolex Explorer is one of the brand’s most understated models in my opinion. It’s not quite as well known as the Rolex Submariner with its rotating diver’s bezel or the  chronograph-equipped Daytona. It’s also not quite as timeless as the Rolex Day-Date.

That’s because it’s built for one thing: adventure. But while it may be one of Rolex’s simplest designs, it carries a history that’s anything but ordinary.

The Rolex Explorer was officially introduced in 1953, the same year Sir Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay became the first climbers to reach the summit of Mount Everest. Rolex had already been testing its watches in extreme conditions, including on previous Everest expeditions, and the Explorer was born from those experiences.

Built for durability, legibility, and reliability, it featured a clean black dial, high-contrast numerals at 3, 6, and 9, and a robust steel case designed to handle whatever the elements threw at it.

Over the years, the Rolex Explorer became the ultimate “go anywhere, do anything” watch. It was simple, reliable, and versatile enough to be worn from the mountains to the boardroom.

The reference 1016, produced from 1960 to 1989, remains one of the most beloved Explorers of all time, known for its timeless design and impressive longevity.

Even as Rolex introduced new variations, including a brief move to a 39mm case in 2010, the Explorer has largely stuck to its roots, staying true to its original purpose as a rugged, no-frills tool watch.

Then, in 1971, Rolex expanded the Explorer lineup with a brand-new model suitably named the Explorer 2. While it shared the same spirit as the original, it was designed for a different kind of adventurer, spelunkers, or cave explorers, who needed a way to distinguish between day and night in total darkness.

The Rolex Explorer II featured a fixed 24-hour bezel and an extra orange-tipped hour hand, originally functioning as an AM/PM indicator. Over time, it evolved to include independent GMT functionality, making it a popular choice for travelers as well.

Today, the Rolex Explorer and Rolex Explorer 2 continue to be staples in the brand’s lineup. They’re not as flashy as a Day-Date or as hyped as a Submariner, but that’s exactly what makes them special.

Built for adventure yet understated enough for everyday wear, they appeal to those who appreciate rugged functionality without the need for excess attention. Now without further ado, let’s get up close and personal with the Rolex Explorer II and see if it truly lives up to its status…

The Case

One of the defining features of the Rolex Explorer II is its robust and no-nonsense case. At 42mm in diameter, it’s on the larger side for a Rolex sports model, but that added wrist presence makes sense given the watch’s tool-watch DNA. It’s built to be legible, durable, and ready for adventure, whether you’re actually exploring caves or just navigating your daily routine.

Crafted from Rolex’s proprietary Oystersteel (a 904L stainless steel alloy), the case is highly corrosion-resistant and maintains its polished sheen even under harsh conditions.

Rolex originally introduced 904L steel in the 1980s, borrowing the material from aerospace and chemical industries where extreme durability is a necessity. In real-world use, that means the Explorer II can handle almost anything, whether it’s saltwater, sweat, or the occasional scrape without losing its luster.

The case follows Rolex’s classic Oyster architecture, which means a monobloc middle case, a screw-down case back, and a screw-down Twinlock crown to ensure a water resistance rating of 100 meters.

That may not be as deep as a Submariner, but for a watch designed primarily for land-based adventure, it’s more than enough. The Twinlock system provides a secure seal against moisture and dust, and unlike the chunkier Triplock crown on the Submariner and GMT-Master II, the Rolex Explorer II’s crown is slightly smaller and more integrated into the case design. The crown guards also follow Rolex’s recent design tweaks, appearing more angled and streamlined compared to previous versions.

Then there’s the bezel which is arguably one of the most recognizable features of the Rolex Explorer 2. Unlike the ceramic bezels found on many modern Rolex sports models, the Explorer II sticks with its traditional brushed stainless steel bezel, engraved with a black-filled 24-hour scale.

Some collectors speculated that Rolex might introduce a ceramic version with some of their newest references, but in keeping with tradition, they wisely stuck to the brushed steel.

On the wrist, the case has a commanding yet balanced feel. The mostly brushed finish gives it a utilitarian appearance, but the polished sides of the case add just the right amount of refinement.

Rolex also adjusted the proportions slightly in recent years by widening the bracelet and slimming the inner edges of the lugs. While these tweaks are subtle, they help improve the overall balance and wearability of the watch, making it feel more proportionate despite its 42mm size.

Topping it all off is a sapphire crystal with Rolex’s signature Cyclops lens over the date. While Rolex historically avoided heavy anti-reflective coatings, recent models feature improved inner-surface coatings to reduce glare and improve legibility.

Combined with the bright, high-contrast dial and large markers, the Rolex Explorer II remains one of the most readable Rolex watches in any lighting condition.

The Dial

Speaking of legibility, the dial of the Rolex Explorer 2 is designed with absolute clarity in mind. Whether you opt for the classic black display or the striking white “Polar” dial, readability is exceptional as you’d expect.

Each dial comes with bold geometric hour markers which include a mix of triangles, circles, and rectangles so legibility is instant. The high-contrast design of the Polar dial is particularly impressive with the stark white background offset by deep matte black markers and hands, a combination rarely seen in Rolex’s lineup.

The black dial version, by contrast, uses polished white gold markers and hands filled with Rolex’s proprietary Chromalight luminescent material, giving it a more traditional but equally effective look.

Another defining feature of the Rolex Explorer 2 is its bold orange GMT hand, a nod to the original 1971 reference 1655. Unlike the modern GMT-Master II, which features a rotating bezel for tracking a second time zone, the Explorer II uses a fixed, 24-hour-engraved steel bezel.

This means the GMT hand is primarily intended as an AM/PM indicator for those operating in environments where day and night distinctions are blurred. That being said, the GMT hand can still be used to track a second time zone, making the Explorer 2 an equally functional travel companion.

Of course, no Rolex sports model would be complete without the brand’s signature Cyclops lens over the date window at 3 o’clock. The magnification makes the date easier to read, once again adding to the dial’s reputation for legibility.

Finally, the dial is completed by some simple lettering for the EXPLORER II logo at 12 o’clock, printed in orange to match the GMT hand, and markings for the Superlative Chronometer certified movement at 6 o’clock.

The Movement

The Rolex Explorer II runs on the caliber 3285, the same movement found in the GMT-Master II. If that sounds like Rolex cutting corners, it’s not. The 3285 is a thoroughly modern movement built to handle both everyday wear and the kind of punishment you’d expect from a watch

designed for explorers. It’s chronometer-certified, accurate to within +2/-2 seconds per day, and packs a 70-hour power reserve which is more than enough to keep ticking through a weekend off the wrist.

Where the Explorer 2 diverges from the GMT-Master II is in how it uses its 24-hour hand. Since the bezel is fixed, this isn’t a watch designed to juggle three time zones at once. Instead, it stays true to its roots by helping the wearer distinguish day from night in environments where the sun isn’t a reliable indicator.

The independently adjustable local hour hand still makes it a useful travel companion, but it’s clear that Rolex intends this watch for those who need a rugged, no-nonsense tool rather than a jet-setter’s accessory.

Functionally, it’s as practical as it gets. The hacking seconds function allows for precise time setting, and the quick-set local hour hand makes adjusting for time zones a breeze.

The date mechanism, which as mentioned is viewed through the Cyclops lens, jumps instantly at midnight, rather than creeping forward. These are small details, but ones that Rolex gets right.

The Strap

The strap for the Rolex Explorer 2 is exactly what you’d expect. It’s a solid three-row link 904L stainless steel Oyster bracelet that is durable, comfortable, and secure.

It comes with a handsome brushed finish that matches the rugged, tool-watch aesthetic of the case. There’s no polished center link here either, just a utilitarian design that feels every bit as refined as it does functional.

The bracelet is secured with Rolex’s Oysterlock folding safety clasp, designed to prevent accidental opening. It’s a small but critical feature, especially for those who intend to put the watch through its paces in unpredictable conditions.

And because comfort is just as important as security, Rolex has included the Easylink extension system, allowing for a quick 5mm adjustment without the need for tools.

The integration between case and bracelet is seamless, with solid end links that flow perfectly into the lugs. Rolex has never been one to cut corners when it comes to their bracelets, and it shows here; the brushed surfaces are crisp, the taper of the bracelet feels just right, and the overall balance on the wrist is impeccable.

And while the Oyster bracelet is undoubtedly the perfect match for the Explorer 2, Rolex has given you options. With a 21mm lug width, you could swap in a rubber or leather strap if you really wanted to, but honestly, it’s hard to imagine anything looking better than the bracelet it comes with.

On-Wrist Experience

The Rolex Explorer 2 has never been a delicate watch and the models in the current collection carry that tradition forward. At 42mm in diameter and 12.5mm thick, it has a definite presence on the wrist. It’s substantial enough to feel like a proper tool watch, but not so bulky that it

becomes cumbersome. It won’t disappear under a fitted shirt cuff, but it’s still comfortable enough for all-day wear.

Thanks to the updated case proportions and subtly refined bracelet that came with the 2021 Explorer II, the watch feels well-balanced, with the weight evenly distributed across the wrist.

The fully brushed Oyster bracelet keeps things secure without sacrificing comfort, and the Easylink extension ensures a perfect fit no matter the situation.

If you have a wrist in the 6.5 to 7.5 inch range, the 42mm case will wear well, sitting broad but not overwhelming. On smaller wrists, it will lean further into its tool-watch identity, offering that decisive, adventure-ready aesthetic with an oversized look, but one that looks purposeful.  

Price & Availability

The Rolex Explorer 2 holds a prominent position in the luxury watch market and that’s mirrored in its pricing and availability. As of March 2025, the retail price for a new Explorer II stands at around $9,750. However, due to high demand and limited availability, getting one isn’t easy.

There are a lot of long waiting lists with authorised retailers, and any retailer online suggesting they have them in stock probably deserves a second look.

Because of their current allusivity, Rolex Explorer 2 watches have increased prices on the pre-owned market. Of course, prices vary depending on the condition, age and provenance, but from looking, most models are selling for around $10,000 to $12,800.

If you are going to purchase pre-owned, just be sure you’re choosing a reputable retailer like Exquisite Timepieces. We ensure all of our pre-owned Rolex watches are genuine and we’ll ensure your model comes with the box, papers and official warranty.

Conclusion

If you were to ask me, then yes, the Rolex Explorer 2 more than lives up to its reputation. Sure, it’s a luxury sports watch but it’s equally a rugged, adventure-ready timepiece with real functionality and a history to back it up. It’s clearly built to withstand the elements but also maintains Rolex’s classic design language and drive for precision.

And while it might not be as popular as the Submariner or Daytona, it’s still a staple for those who appreciate durability, reliability, and understated style.

It’s mainly a watch for people who need more than just aesthetics. Travelers will benefit from the independent GMT function, collectors will appreciate its heritage, and those who prefer a no-nonsense tool watch will find it a perfect fit.

With its 42mm case and well-balanced proportions, it offers wrist presence without unnecessary bulk, making it suitable for both rugged environments and daily wear.

Availability can be a challenge, but let’s be honest, that just adds to the Explorer 2’s appeal. Demand often exceeds supply, so that keeps both retail and pre-owned prices strong so if you’re looking at a Rolex as an investment, it might be a smart choice.

All in all, the Rolex Explorer 2 is a watch that delivers where it matters. It’s tough enough to handle real-world adventures, refined enough for everyday wear, and built with the level of craftsmanship that has made Rolex a household name.

cartier tank must small vs large

Cartier Tank Must Showdown: Small vs. Large

Charlotte H

April 28, 2025

Size matters, especially when you’re strapping on a watch as legendary as the Cartier Tank Must. And let’s be real, choosing between the Small and Large isn’t exactly easy.

On one hand, you want your watch to make an impression, so it fares to go big, right? But then you remember this is a dress watch, so the size should feel effortless, and comfortable, sitting just right without dominating your frame.

As someone who obsesses over watch sizes, and as a person with a relatively small wrist but a love for larger watches, I know how important it is to find the right balance. Too big, and it overwhelms your wrist but too small, and it might not give you the presence you want.

The Cartier Tank Must is all about proportions, elegance, and wearability, so choosing between the Small and Large comes down to more than just aesthetics. It’s about how it feels, how it fits, and how it complements your style. In this guide, I’ll break it all down to help you find your perfect match.

A Quick History of the Cartier Tank Must

Cartier Tank Must History

The Cartier Tank is one of the most iconic watches of all time, a design that has barely changed since its creation in 1917. Inspired by the silhouette of military tanks viewed from above, its clean lines and rectangular shape broke away from the round pocket watches of the era. The Tank was revolutionary, not just in design but also in its philosophy.

It was a watch for everyone, worn by style icons, Hollywood stars, and royalty alike. Over the decades, Cartier introduced multiple variations, but in the 1970s, a new era of the Tank was born with the Must de Cartier, otherwise known as the Tank Must.

The 1970s were a turning point for the watch industry. With the rise of quartz movements, traditional mechanical watches were facing an identity crisis.

Cartier, known for its ultra-luxurious timepieces, saw an opportunity to create something more accessible while maintaining the brand’s signature elegance. Enter the Must de Cartier collection in 1977. Unlike its solid gold predecessors, the Tank Must featured gold-plated cases and quartz movements, making it a more affordable luxury.

Minimalist yet striking, the Cartier Tank Must was a departure from the ornate detailing of other Cartier timepieces. Many of the models had no numerals and indices, just a sleek dial and the classic sword-shaped hands.

The crown, still adorned with a blue cabochon, added a touch of unexpected flair. This balance of simplicity and boldness made the Tank Must an instant hit. It was a watch that felt luxurious but wasn’t out of reach which is a rare feat in high-end watchmaking.

Fast forward to 2021 and Cartier revived the Tank Must bringing back its signature minimalist aesthetic. The colorful lacquered dials returned as did many of the no-numeral dials. To this day, the collection stays true to the original Must ethos, remaining elegant, unisex, and effortlessly wearable.

The Cartier Tank Must Small

The Cartier Tank Must actually comes in three sizes: Small, Large, and Extra Large. The Extra Large is the only model equipped with an automatic movement, so today, we’re focusing on the two quartz-powered sizes, the Small and Large models, to help you decide which one suits you best.

The Cartier Tank Must Small measures 29.5mm by 22mm with a slim height of 6.6mm, making it the most compact and refined of the lineup.

Each model maintains the Tank’s signature aesthetic with its slim, polished rectangular case topped with sapphire crystal glass. And of course, they all feature the brand’s hallmark blue spinel cabochon set into the crown.

As of writing this article, the modern Tank Must Small offers four different variations, all sharing the same crisp white dial with black Roman numerals, blued sword-shaped hands, and an internal railway minutes track.

The most accessible model in the collection is the classic Small Tank Must on a black leather strap, powered by a traditional Swiss quartz movement. It’s elegant, understated, and a perfect introduction to the world of Cartier.

For those looking for something a little more innovative, there’s the Small Tank Must SolarBeat™. Debuting with the modern Tank Must collection, the SolarBeat™ movement is a groundbreaking photovoltaic-powered quartz caliber that uses light to recharge, offering an impressive 16-year battery life.

This means fewer battery changes and a more sustainable way to wear a luxury timepiece. Externally, this model looks identical to its traditional quartz counterpart but offers a more eco-conscious and forward-thinking movement inside.

For a touch of extra glamour, Cartier also offers the Small Tank Must with diamonds. This version retains the same SolarBeat™ movement but adds brilliant-cut diamonds along the case flanks, giving it a refined sparkle that elevates its presence on the wrist. It’s still classic but with an extra dose of elegance.

Finally, the last model in the Small Tank Must collection swaps the traditional leather strap for a sleek stainless steel bracelet.

Also powered by the SolarBeat™ movement, this version blends the timeless Cartier aesthetic with a more contemporary and versatile metal bracelet, making it perfect for those who prefer a polished, everyday-wear look.

The Cartier Tank Large

If you’re considering the Cartier Tank Must Large, you have even more choices than with the Small model. Not only are there multiple dial colors, but also different dial layouts including those without any numerals or indices, a design I personally love. If you appreciate minimalism, this could be a big deciding factor for you.

First things first, all models labeled as “Large” share the same dimensions measuring to 33.7mm by 25.5mm, with a slim 6.6mm height. They’re all crafted from stainless steel, featuring the signature rectangular case, polished sides, and sapphire crystal glass.

Much like the Small variations, some of these Large models stick to the classic Cartier aesthetic, featuring the crisp white dial with black Roman numerals, blued steel hands, and an internal railway minute track.

One of these comes on a black leather strap, while another offers the same strap but with a touch of extra luxury, diamonds set along the flanks of the case. Two other options swap out the leather for a sleek stainless steel H-link bracelet.

For those looking for something a little more modern and sustainable, there are also versions that trade the traditional quartz movement for the photovoltaic SolarBeat™ movement. These models come in both leather strap and steel bracelet variations.

Then, we have the models that truly stand out. These are where Cartier embraces a more minimalist, yet boldly colorful approach. Unlike the traditional white dial versions, these pieces strip away the Roman numerals and railway track altogether, leaving just two sleek hands and the Cartier logo at 12 o’clock.

The effect is a strikingly clean design that feels both contemporary and timeless. These models feature lacquered dials in four stunning shades of burgundy red, emerald green, royal blue, and classic black.

Each dial is complemented by rhodium-finished steel sword-shaped hands and a semi-matte alligator leather strap in a matching color, secured with a steel ardillon buckle.

Interestingly, despite being larger in surface area than the Small model, these minimalist Large variations are actually the slimmest of all, with a height of just 6mm giving them an extra sleek, refined profile on the wrist.

Cartier Tank Must Small vs Large – How to Choose

So, now that we’ve gone over both models individually, how do they stack up against each other? If you’re stuck deciding between the Small and the Large, let’s break down the key differences to help you figure out which one’s the better fit for your wrist and your style.

Differences in Size and Proportions

Obviously, the most obvious difference is size. The Small measures 29.5mm by 22mm, while the Large comes in at 33.7mm by 25.5mm. That might not sound like a massive jump, but on the wrist, it’s noticeable. The Large also has a bit more presence, without tipping over into being oversized.

Another key factor is thickness. The classic white-dialled Small and Large versions are a little thicker at around 6.6mm, whereas the Large with the ultra-minimalist lacquered dials are even slimmer at just 6mm, giving them an extra sleek, refined look.

Differences in Design Options

While both sizes offer the classic Cartier silver-white dials with Roman numerals, blued hands, and polished steel cases, the Large model gives you a few more dial colours to choose from. If you love the traditional Cartier aesthetic, both sizes will work, but if you want something a little different, the Large has a few options that stand out.

Some feature no numerals at all, just clean dials with two hands and the Cartier logo, creating a minimalist, modern feel. This ultra-clean look, paired with lacquered dials in striking colors like burgundy, green, blue, and black, isn’t available in the Small size, making the Large the go-to if you want something bolder.

Differences in Movement

Both sizes come with traditional quartz movements and Cartier’s eco-friendly SolarBeat™ movement. So thankfully, there’s no difference here in terms of functionality.

You’ve got a choice of whether you want the classic quartz or the SolarBeat upgrade. That said, if you’ve got your heart set on an automatic movement, then you’ll have to explore the Cartier Tank Much Extra Large family for that.

Differences in Price

Naturally, the Large models are slightly more expensive, typically by a couple of hundred dollars. In the grand scheme of Cartier pricing, that’s not a huge jump, but if you’re on the fence between the two sizes, it might be a factor worth considering.

The Small keeps things a little more budget-friendly, while the Large asks for a bit more, but also gives you extra dial options and a bigger presence on the wrist in return.

Which One is Right for You?

If you have a smaller wrist, prefer something more discreet, or just love the idea of a classic, timeless Cartier dress watch, the Cartier Tank Must Small is a fantastic choice. It’s elegant, refined, and fits beautifully under a cuff.

That said, if you want a little more presence, appreciate a slightly larger dial, or love the idea of those sleek, numeral-free color options, the Large is the way to go.

Conclusion

At the end of the day, both the Cartier Tank Must Small and Large are stunning options. You can’t really ever go wrong with a Cartier because these watches, no matter their size, are timeless, effortlessly stylish, and built with the kind of design language that has made them icons for over a century.

But when it comes down to choosing between them, there are two big factors that should guide your decision: the size of your wrist (and the presence you want the watch to have) and which dial design speaks to you the most.

For example, I have relatively small wrists at around 5.5 inches, so logically, the Cartier Tank Must Small would be the best fit for my frame. But I can’t help but love those bright lacquered dials with no numerals or indices on the Large models.

Those are what really call to me. They feel more aligned with my style, and I know I’d reach for them ten times more than the classic white dial with Roman numerals. So for me, that’s what would make the decision.

And that’s exactly how you should go about it, too. Consider the sizing, think about the designs you love, and decide what matters most to you. If you want something classic, understated, and perfectly proportioned for a smaller wrist, the Cartier Tank Must Small is a fantastic choice.

If you want something a little bolder, with a bit more presence and unique dial options, the Large is where it’s at. Either way, you’ll end up with a Cartier Tank on your wrist and that’s never a bad thing.

rolex president bracelet vs jubilee

When we think about watches and which one to buy for ourselves, most of us focus on the dial, the case, or maybe the movement inside. But the bracelet is often an afterthought.

It really shouldn’t be though, because the strap can make a huge difference to the watch. It doesn’t just keep it secured to your wrist, but it plays a huge part in how the watch looks, feels and even wears over time.

And if there’s one brand that’s absolutely nailed the art of bracelet design, it’s Rolex. Over the decades, Rolex has introduced a handful of iconic bracelets, but two stand out above the rest: the President bracelet and the Jubilee bracelet.

If you’ve spent any time browsing Rolex watches, you’ve probably seen both. The President has a bold and luxurious three-link design while the Jubilee gives off more of a vintage vibe with its intricate, dressy five-link construction.

But what’s the real difference between them? Is one better than the other? And most importantly, which one is the best match for you and your style? That’s exactly what we’re about to break down in this head-to-head battle of Rolex’s two iconic bracelets.

The Rolex President Bracelet

The Rolex President Bracelet

If there’s one bracelet in the world of watches that screams power, prestige, and luxury, it’s the Rolex President.

Even if you’re not a hardcore watch enthusiast, chances are you’ve seen this bracelet before whether it’s wrapped around the wrist of a world leader, a celebrity, or perhaps in a glitzy Rolex display case.

There’s something undeniably regal about the President bracelet, and that’s no accident. Rolex designed it to make a statement, and over the decades, it’s become just as iconic as the watches it’s attached to.

The President bracelet made its debut in 1956, exclusively designed for the launch of the Rolex Day-Date, a watch that was itself groundbreaking since it was the first to display both the date and the full day of the week spelled out on the dial.

Rolex didn’t just want the Day-Date to be another luxury timepiece though, they wanted it to be a watch that symbolizes success and status. So they created a bracelet to match,  one that was bold, beautiful, and reserved only for the brand’s most prestigious models.

The Rolex President is a three-piece link design, but unlike the flat, wide links of the sporty Oyster bracelet it has semi-circular, almost little D-shaped links, that give the bracelet a rounded, almost fluid look as it catches the light.

It’s also noticeably more substantial and weighty on the wrist compared to the Oyster which only further adds to its luxurious feel. It’s one of those watch straps that feels like jewellery, but still with the durability and comfort you want in a high-end timepiece.

You’ll only ever find the President bracelet on Rolex watches made from precious metals. Rolex doesn’t do stainless steel when it comes to this bracelet. Instead, the President is exclusively crafted from 18k gold (yellow, white, or Everose) or platinum, ensuring that every time it’s worn, it feels like a statement of status.

You’ll most commonly see it on the Day-Date, which many people now casually refer to as the “Rolex President” because of the bracelet, but it also appears on certain versions of the Lady-Datejust in precious metals.

So why is the Rolex President bracelet called the President? The name first emerged in 1965 when U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson was regularly seen wearing a yellow gold Day-Date with the newly designed bracelet.

Rolex even ran an advertisement referring to it as “the President’s watch” and from that moment on, the name stuck. In fact, it wasn’t long before the bracelet itself became known as the “President bracelet,” even though Rolex had originally just called it the Day-Date bracelet.

There’s also a popular story about Dwight D. Eisenhower being gifted a gold Rolex with a similar bracelet, but that was actually an Oyster bracelet, not the President.

Still, by the time Johnson put it on his wrist and countless other world leaders, CEOs, and Hollywood icons followed suit, the association between the Day-Date, the President bracelet, and a symbol of power was locked in forever.

One of the most unique aspects of the President bracelet is its hidden Crownclasp. Unlike traditional watch clasps that are visible when closed, the Crownclasp blends seamlessly into the design.

Once fastened, you can only see the iconic Rolex crown logo, making it look like the bracelet has no visible opening at all. It’s subtle, refined, and just another example of the attention to detail that Rolex are well known for.

Over the years, Rolex has played around with some variations of the President bracelet. Some vintage models feature a “bark finish” on the center link, a textured effect that mimics the look of tree bark. Others have appeared adorned with diamonds or other embellishments.

But the core design has remained largely unchanged since 1956, which is a testament to how perfect the President bracelet really is.

The Rolex Jubilee Bracelet

The Rolex Jubilee Bracelet

If you know anything about Rolex, you’ll know the Jubilee bracelet is a bit of a legend in its own right. It’s one of those designs that’s instantly recognizable the moment you spot those small, intricate links shimmering on someone’s wrist.

And while the Jubilee bracelet was originally designed for dress watches, it’s found its way onto some of Rolex’s sportier models too, proving it can do both sophistication and casual cool rather effortlessly.

The Rolex Jubilee bracelet made its debut in 1945 and was specifically created to celebrate Rolex’s 40th anniversary, hence the name Jubilee.

Rolex needed a bracelet that would match the grandeur of their newest release, the Datejust, a groundbreaking watch that was the first to display an automatically changing date on the dial. Naturally, a watch this special needed a bracelet to match, so Rolex came up with something entirely new.

Unlike the bold three-link Oyster bracelet, the Jubilee featured a more intricate five-piece link design, combining brushed outer links with three smaller, polished center links. The result was a bracelet that looked dressy, felt incredibly comfortable, and oozed understated luxury.

Initially, the Jubilee bracelet was available only in solid gold, underscoring its status as a true luxury accessory. But as time went on, Rolex began introducing two-tone (Rolesor) and stainless steel versions, allowing more people to experience the Jubilee’s charm without the eye-watering price tag of solid gold.

That shift also paved the way for the Jubilee to appear on a wider variety of models than the Datejust. That again made it more versatile in both style and appeal.

One of the defining features of the Jubilee bracelet is how it drapes around your wrist. The five-link design with three smaller inner links and two larger outer links makes it incredibly flexible and comfortable to wear.

It’s less rigid than the Oyster bracelet which gives it a more elegant, jewelry-like feel. And the way the polished center links catch the light is beautiful.

The Rolex Jubilee didn’t stay exclusive to the Datejust for long. In 1959, Rolex fitted it to the newly introduced GMT-Master, a pilot’s watch designed for international travelers. The combination of a tool watch and a dressy Jubilee bracelet was a bold move, but it worked.

The polished center links added a touch of refinement to an otherwise rugged timepiece, making it the perfect travel companion for those who appreciated both function and style.

Over the years, the Jubilee bracelet has undergone a few subtle changes. Early versions from the 1950s and 60s had folded links, meaning the metal was rolled and folded over itself to form each link, giving the bracelet a light and slightly “jangly” feel.

In the late 1970s, Rolex upgraded to solid links, giving the bracelet a more substantial and durable feel on the wrist. They also introduced a hidden Crownclasp, allowing the clasp to blend seamlessly with the design so that it looked like an unbroken band around the wrist/

The Jubilee did take a bit of a backseat in the Rolex sports watch lineup for a while. By the late 1980s, Rolex was favoring the sportier Oyster bracelet for models like the Submariner and GMT-Master.

The Jubilee, meanwhile, remained the hallmark of dress watches like the Datejust. But then, in 2018, Rolex did something unexpected and brought the Jubilee back to the GMT-Master II.

When the Pepsi GMT-Master II (ref. 126710BLRO) was introduced with a Jubilee bracelet many of us collectors were shocked, but in the best way.

Suddenly, the Jubilee was cool again, not just for dress watches, but for sports watches too. Rolex followed up with a Batman GMT (ref. 126710BLNR) on a Jubilee in 2019, confirming that the bracelet was now a legitimate option for their most iconic tool watches.

And that’s what makes the Jubilee bracelet so special — it effortlessly walks the line between formal and casual. On a Datejust, it’s pure elegance. On a GMT-Master, it’s a conversation starter. It’s also one of the most comfortable bracelets Rolex has ever produced.

The way the five-piece links conform to the wrist makes it feel like a piece of jewelry rather than a watch strap. And despite its delicate appearance, the Jubilee is built like a tank.

The Rolex President vs Jubilee: How to Choose

When it comes to Rolex, the bracelet isn’t just an afterthought, it’s an essential part of the watch’s identity. Rolex puts just as much engineering and craftsmanship into its bracelets as it does into its movements and cases.

And when we’re talking about high-end Rolex models, two bracelets arguably stand above the rest: the President and the Jubilee.

Both have a rich history, both are unmistakably Rolex, and both offer a level of comfort and luxury that other brands have tried and failed to replicate. But they also have their own personality, their own exclusive models, and their own appeal. So, how do you choose between the two?

The Design and Look

First things first — how do these two bracelets actually look on the wrist?

The President bracelet feels like a power move. It’s made up of three semi-circular, polished links that give it a very distinct and solid presence.

There’s a certain weightiness to the design too, both literally and figuratively. It’s bold, it’s eye-catching, and it’s dripping in luxury. The high-polish center links shine like jewelry, making the President bracelet the ultimate status symbol.

The Jubilee bracelet, on the other hand, is a bit more understated. It has a five-link construction, two brushed outer links and three smaller polished center links, that creates a beautifully intricate texture around the wrist.

Unlike the President, which feels powerful and solid, the Jubilee drapes like silk. It’s elegant, dressy, and has a delicate sparkle that catches the light in just the right way.

Which Watches Can You Get Them On?

You can’t just put a President bracelet on any old Rolex. It’s exclusive. And that’s part of its allure. It was designed specifically for the Rolex Day-Date when it launched in 1956 and to this day, it remains exclusive to the Day-Date collection and a few select Lady-Datejust models.

It also only comes in precious metals including solid 18k gold and platinum. There are no steel versions. It’s this exclusivity that makes the President feel a bit more elusive and exclusive.

The Jubilee bracelet, meanwhile, is far more versatile. It made its debut on the Datejust in 1945 but has since spread its wings. It now graces a variety of Rolex models, including the Datejust, GMT-Master II, and even certain Sky-Dweller references. You can also get it in stainless steel, two-tone (Rolesor), or solid gold, depending on the model.

Which Rolex Bracelet Is Right For You?

If you’ve got your heart set on a Rolex Day-Date, then your choice is made for you – it’s coming on a President bracelet. No exceptions. The Day-Date and the President bracelet are a package deal, and frankly, they couldn’t be a better match.

But if you’re looking at something like a Datejust, GMT-Master II, or Sky-Dweller, you’ve got a bit more freedom. These models often come with the option of a Jubilee bracelet, or in some cases, an Oyster bracelet, giving you a bit more room to choose what suits you best.

Another thing to keep in mind, and something many watch wearers don’t think about but should, is how they feel on the wrist. The President bracelet has some serious weight to it, especially if you’re going for solid gold or platinum.

It’s heavy, solid, and there’s absolutely no mistaking that you’ve got a Rolex on your wrist. The semi-circular three-link design hugs your wrist nicely, but it’s still got a noticeable presence. For a lot of people, that’s exactly what they want, a reassuring weight that screams luxury and success.

The Jubilee, on the other hand, is lighter and feels a little more like silk on your wrist. Thanks to its five-piece link construction, it has this fluid, almost liquid-like drape that is undeniably comfortable and dressy.

It’s also a lot less bulky which makes it perfect for all-day wear, especially if you’re the type who doesn’t love the feeling of a heavy watch weighing down your wrist. It’s subtle, it’s comfortable, and it’s got just enough sparkle to feel special without being too flashy.

So who’s the President bracelet really for? Well, if you’re someone who wants their watch to make a statement, this is it.

The President bracelet doesn’t do subtle. It’s bold, luxurious, and carries the weight of history. When you wear a Day-Date with a President bracelet, people notice. It’s deeply tied to power and prestige and it gives that “I’ve made it” energy/

The Jubilee bracelet has a very different vibe. It’s still luxurious, but in a quieter, more versatile way. It doesn’t shout for attention like the President does and instead has an effortless classiness about it.

The five-piece links give it a bit of flash, especially on two-tone models, but it still feels subtle enough to wear every single day. And that’s one of the biggest advantages of the Jubilee, it transitions seamlessly from casual to formal without missing a beat.

It’s also worth mentioning that if you’re eyeing a GMT-Master II with a Pepsi or Batman bezel, the Jubilee bracelet is a total game-changer. It adds this beautiful vintage-meets-modern aesthetic that feels completely different from the more utilitarian look of the Oyster bracelet.

Conclusion

Ultimately, choosing between the Rolex President and Jubilee bracelet comes down to the kind of presence you want your watch to have.

The President bracelet is bold, luxurious, and carries a weight, both physically and symbolically, that few other watch bracelets can match. It’s the choice for those who want their watch to feel like a statement piece, something that exudes power and status.

Meanwhile, the Rolex Jubilee offers a quieter, more versatile kind of luxury. It’s refined, effortlessly comfortable, and can move from casual to formal with ease. We’re pretty sure that no matter which Rolex bracelet you choose, you’re going to be very happy. It’s a Rolex at the end of the day, so there’s really no such thing as a wrong choice.

rolex 5512 vs 5513

What is the world’s most famous dive watch? I don’t have the answer, but I’m certain the Rolex Submariner is somewhere near the top of the list. It’s a model that’s far from just some reliable dive watch – although it’s certainly that too – but a cultural icon and one of the most highly collectible timepieces of all time.   

The Rolex Submariner is not new, having launched back in 1953, so as you’d expect, there’s a plethora of old and new models out there. But if you were to ask me, two of the most iconic models in the Submariner’s lineup are the references 5512 and 5513. 

These vintage classics represent the golden age of Rolex’s dive watches, and while they may look nearly identical at first glance, there’s a lot hiding beneath the surface that sets them apart. 

Both models feature the signature 40mm stainless steel case, crown guards, rotating bezel, and time-only black dials that define the early Submariner aesthetic. They also share the robust acrylic crystals that marked the pre-sapphire era, making them quintessential vintage pieces. 

But the 5512 and 5513 are different in more ways than you might expect. So, if you’re wondering what the differences are between the Rolex Submariner 5512 and 5513 and you’re deciding which vintage model to get for yourself, we suggest you keep reading… 

The Rolex Submariner 5512 

Rolex Submariner 5512 

The Rolex Submariner 5512 is an important model in the history of the Swiss watchmaker, as it marked a rather major turning point in both the design and functionality of the Submariner collection. Introduced in 1959, the 5512 was the first Submariner to feature crown guards, a bold innovation that set the stage for the modern dive watch as we know it. 

Before the 5512, Submariners lacked protective shoulders around the winding crown, leaving it vulnerable to damage from accidental knocks. By adding crown guards, Rolex not only made the Submariner more durable but also expanded the case size from 38mm to 40mm, giving the watch its iconic proportions.

What makes the 5512 even more fascinating is the evolution of its crown guard design. Early models were fitted with square crown guards, a style Rolex quickly abandoned due to its impracticality and aesthetics. 

Next came the pointed crown guards, which were produced until 1963, when the more familiar rounded crown guards were introduced. These variations, particularly the rare square and pointed crown guards, are highly prized by collectors today. 

The Submariner 5512 was also notable for its technical advancements. Early examples were powered by the Caliber 1530 movement, which was not chronometer-certified. These models also featured dials with only two lines of text indicating the water resistance and the Submariner name. 

However, this changed when Rolex transitioned to the Caliber 1560 and later the Caliber 1570, both chronometer-certified movements. With this upgrade, the dials gained two additional lines of text to indicate the watch’s chronometer status, creating the now-famous “four-line” dial. 

Aesthetically, the 5512 is a quintessential vintage Submariner. Its stainless steel case is robust and functional, while the rotating bezel with a black aluminum insert provides a practical 60-minute scale for divers. 

Early models featured gilt-gloss dials, which were later replaced by matte dials, marking the shift from a more decorative to a more utilitarian look. The luminous markers on the dials were initially made with radium, but Rolex eventually transitioned to tritium for safety reasons. 

The Rolex Submariner 5512 was in production for an impressive two decades, officially ceasing in 1978. Over its lifespan, it remained a watch designed with professional divers in mind but gained popularity far beyond the diving community. Today, its enduring appeal lies in its perfect balance of vintage charm, technical innovation, and historical significance.

The Rolex Submariner 5513 

Rolex Submariner 5513

The Rolex Submariner 5513 was launched a couple of years later, in 1962, as the sibling to the 5512. While the two models appear nearly identical at a glance, the 5513 carved out its own legacy as the non-chronometer-certified version of Rolex’s iconic dive watch. 

This distinction was reflected in its use of the Caliber 1530 and later the Caliber 1520, both of which were simpler, non-chronometer movements. By comparison, the 5512, with its chronometer-certified calibers, bore additional text on its dial proclaiming its superior precision. 

The dial of the 5513 is one of its defining features. Early examples sported the minimalist two-line configuration, emphasizing the Submariner name and depth rating, giving it a clean and understated appearance. 

These early models also featured gilt-gloss dials, a hallmark of the era, and were fitted with pointed crown guards, a design shared with the 5512 of the same period. As production continued, Rolex transitioned to matte black dials with painted hour markers and, later still, glossy black dials with white gold surrounds on the markers. 

In terms of the case and bezel, the 5513 retained the 40mm stainless steel construction that has become synonymous with the Submariner. Its rotating bezel, featuring a black aluminum insert with a 0-60-minute scale, also remained, as did the watch’s acrylic crystal glass and the luminous material on its dial and hands, which shifted from radium in the earliest examples to the safer tritium in later models. 

The 5513’s longevity is another remarkable aspect of its history. While the 5512 ceased production in the late 1970s, the 5513 continued to be manufactured until 1989, making it one of the longest-running Submariner references. 

This extended production period means that collectors can often find a wide range of variations, from early gilt dials with rare features to later models with more contemporary design elements. 

The Rolex Submariner 5513 is also well known for its cultural significance. It was famously worn by Sean Connery’s James Bond in Dr. No and Goldfinger, cementing its status as an icon not just of horology but also of popular culture. This association with 007 has only added to its allure among vintage watch enthusiasts.

Rolex Submariner 5512 vs 5513 – How to Choose 

When deciding between the Rolex Submariner 5512 and 5513, you’re faced with two iconic models that look incredibly similar at first glance. 

However, as we’ve touched on already, there are some key differences under the surface that can guide your choice. So what exactly sets these two vintage Submariners apart, and which one will suit your needs best? 

Movement: Chronometer vs. Non-Chronometer

The most significant difference between the Rolex Submariner 5512 and 5513 lies in their movements. The Submariner 5512 was fitted with chronometer-certified movements, starting with the Caliber 1560 and later the Caliber 1570. 

These movements met Rolex’s exacting standards for precision, which is why the 5512 dials bear the “Superlative Chronometer Officially Certified” text, also known as the “four-line dial.”

In contrast, the 5513 was designed as a simpler, non-chronometer version. It began with the Caliber 1530 and transitioned to the Caliber 1520. Its dials feature only two lines of text, giving it a cleaner and more understated appearance. 

While the differences in performance may not be noticeable to a casual wearer, collectors often place a premium on the chronometer status of the 5512.

Rarity and Availability

The production periods of these models also contribute to their differences in rarity. The 5512 was introduced in 1959 and discontinued in 1978, giving it a relatively shorter production run. This means fewer 5512 examples exist in the market today, making it a rarer and more exclusive choice.

The 5513, on the other hand, enjoyed a much longer production run from 1962 to 1989. As a result, it’s often easier to find a 5513 in various conditions and configurations, offering more options for collectors and enthusiasts alike.

Aesthetics and Design

Both the Rolex Submariner 5512 and 5513 share the classic 40mm stainless steel case, rotating bezel with a black aluminum insert, and vintage acrylic crystal. Early examples of both models feature gilt-gloss dials and pointed crown guards, while later iterations transitioned to matte dials with painted markers and, eventually, glossy dials with white gold surrounds.

The main visual difference lies in the dial text: the 5512’s four-line dial versus the 5513’s simpler two-line configuration. This distinction makes the 5512 feel slightly more technical and prestigious, while the 5513 offers a cleaner, minimalist aesthetic that other collectors will prefer.

Price Considerations

The chronometer-certified 5512 has historically been more expensive than the 5513 owing to its higher level of technical achievement and shorter production run. However, the price gap can also depend on the specific model variation, condition, and rarity. 

Early examples with gilt dials or unique features like square crown guards can command significant premiums, regardless of the reference.

For the budget-conscious collector, the 5513 may present a more accessible entry point into the world of vintage Submariners. Its longer production run means there’s a greater variety of options, from early gilt-dial models to later glossy-dial versions.

Which One Should You Pick?

Deciding between the Rolex Submariner 5512 and 5513 ultimately comes down to your personal priorities as a collector or enthusiast. 

Each model offers unique qualities that cater to different tastes and preferences, making this choice a matter of what you value most in a vintage watch.

If exclusivity and technical prowess top your list, the Rolex Submariner 5512 is going to be the better fit for you. With its chronometer-certified movement and the coveted “Superlative Chronometer Officially Certified” text on its dial, the 5512 stands as a testament to Rolex’s precision and attention to detail. 

Its shorter production run also adds an element of rarity, making it a sought-after piece for collectors who prioritize historical significance and exclusivity.

On the other hand, the Rolex Submariner 5513 is ideal for those drawn to simplicity and timeless design. Its two-line dial offers a clean, minimalist aesthetic that has a charm all of its own. 

It also had a longer production run spanning nearly three decades, so it provides plenty more options to collectors, so you have more chance of choosing from early gilt-dial examples to later glossy-dial variations.

Conclusion

Choosing between the Rolex Submariner 5512 and 5513 is a decision that reflects your unique priorities as a collector or enthusiast. Each model holds its own special place in the history of Rolex, offering distinct characteristics that make them both highly desirable. 

The 5512 stands out with its chronometer-certified movement and rarity, while the 5513 captures attention with its clean, timeless design and wide-ranging options.

Owning either reference is a privilege, as both showcase the unparalleled craftsmanship and enduring appeal that has defined Rolex for generations. 

For many, myself included, these two references mark the end of the classic vintage Submariner era. Being able to glance at your wrist and be reminded of this—especially when so many others are choosing modern-day Rolex Submariners—is truly a special experience.

With the insights shared here, you’re now equipped to choose the Rolex Submariner that aligns best with your personal tastes and values. The 5512 and 5513 each bring something unique to the table, and either one would make a remarkable addition to any collection

tudor ranger vs rolex explorer

When it comes to robust, utilitarian tool watches, there is no shortage of models to choose from. But two that often stand out are the Rolex Explorer and the Tudor Ranger. Both are no-nonsense watches built for the outdoors, boasting super-legible dials, rugged construction, and an undeniable air of capability. 

In fact, put them side by side, and it’s easy to get them confused, at least at first glance. But don’t be fooled; while they may look like close cousins (and they are since Rolex and Tudor share the same parent company), these two timepieces come with a lot of differences. 

Rolex, the elder sibling, has a global reputation. It’s the brand synonymous with luxury and achievement, and the Explorer is its understated nod to those who seek adventure without sacrificing style. 

Tudor, on the other hand, is Rolex’s more accessible sibling, known for offering high-quality watches at a more bank-friendly price point. The Ranger reflects that ethos perfectly, delivering the same utilitarian spirit but with a slightly different approach to design.

So, which one should you pick? In this guide, we’ll compare the Tudor Explorer and the Rolex Ranger in detail, highlighting their similarities, differences, and the reasons why each could be the perfect fit for your next adventure.

The Tudor Ranger Collection 

Tudor Ranger Collection

The history of the Tudor Ranger is a little puzzling as there are many parts of the story to consider, but that’s what makes this watch all the more fascinating. The Tudor Ranger we know today was bought back in 2022 to mark 70 years since the British North Greenland Expedition, but its name actually goes way further back. 

Hans Wilsdorf, the man behind Rolex and Tudor, registered it in 1929, but for decades, “Ranger” wasn’t a specific model. Instead, it was more of an idea, like a way to describe a watch that was built for adventure. 

The 1950s were when things started to click into place. Several Tudor watches accompanied the British North Greenland Expedition, a grueling trek across the Arctic. 

The expedition officially used the Oyster Prince, but its rugged, stripped-back design influenced what would eventually become the Ranger. Rather than being a one-to-one replica, the Ranger captured the spirit of reliability in extreme conditions. 

By the 1960s, the Tudor Ranger was finally standing on its own, with a clear identity inclusive of bold, luminous numerals, tough cases, and those signature arrow hands. 

Over the years, it adapted to the times and added features like date windows and improved technology but always stayed true to its utilitarian roots. Fast forward to today, and the Ranger still carries that adventurous vibe, blending old-school practicality with modern tech. 

The Tudor Ranger is a field watch that thrives on simplicity and functionality, making it the perfect companion for adventurers and minimalists alike. 

First introduced in the 1960s, it was created with a clear purpose: to be a tough, reliable timepiece that could withstand demanding environments while remaining easy to use. Decades later, the modern Tudor Ranger stays true to that original vision, combining rugged durability with thoughtful design. 

At the heart of the Ranger is the Tudor Calibre MT5402, a COSC-certified automatic movement with an impressive 70-hour power reserve. This movement ensures the watch is as dependable as it is precise, whether you’re trekking through wilderness or simply going about your daily routine. 

The 39mm stainless steel case also strikes a perfect balance between wearability and durability, with a domed sapphire crystal that resists scratches while adding a subtle vintage touch. 

At the moment, the Tudor Ranger only comes with a matte black dial, which feels like the sensible choice, as it keeps things clean and legible. The dial is largely defined by the bold Arabic numerals marking 3, 6, 9, and 12 o’clock and the bold and sharp arrow-shaped hands, including a red-tipped seconds hand that stands out beautifully against the black backdrop. 

The modern-day Tudor Ranger collection is relatively small, but that attests largely to its recent release in 2022. It also means that if you’re someone easily overwhelmed with choice, the Tudor Ranger family is going to make things easier for you. 

Currently, the collection features just three models, each with the same core features: a 39mm stainless steel case that’s durable yet wearable, a scratch-resistant domed sapphire crystal, and a matte black dial with bold Arabic numerals at 3, 6, 9, and 12 o’clock for excellent legibility. 

All three models are also powered by the same reliable Tudor Calibre MT5402, a COSC-certified automatic movement boasting an impressive 70-hour power reserve. 

The options differ in the straps, giving each watch its own distinct personality. For those who appreciate a classic look, there’s the model with a three-row stainless steel bracelet, which combines toughness with refined style. The second option features a hybrid rubber and leather strap, perfect for those who want a comfortable, sporty vibe that can easily handle active days. 

And then there’s my personal favorite, the Tudor Ranger with a fabric strap. This one features a striped design in red, khaki green, and beige, adding a touch of vintage charm that feels effortlessly outdoorsy.

The Rolex Explorer Collection 

Rolex Explorer Collection

The Rolex Explorer holds a special place in watchmaking history as it is widely known as one of the best-known explorer watches out there. Introduced in 1953, it was a response to the first successful ascent of Mount Everest by Sir Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay. 

While there’s debate over whether an Explorer or its “Pre-Explorer” predecessor made it to the summit, what’s certain is that Rolex used the expedition as the foundation for a watch designed to conquer extremes. 

The Everest expedition was obviously a huge example of human triumph, but it was also a showcase of Rolex’s ground-breaking engineering. For years, the brand had been equipping explorers with its Oyster Perpetual models to test in the harshest environments. 

The feedback gained from these expeditions directly influenced the development of the Explorer, resulting in a watch that could endure punishing conditions while delivering unmatched reliability. 

The connection between the Explorer and exploration has become intrinsic to its identity, with the watch being worn by adventurers tackling everything from icy peaks to scorching deserts. 

And because of that, the Rolex Explorer’s story has grown into something of a legend. It was one of the models that marked a turning point for Rolex, solidifying the brand as a leader in crafting timepieces that combine precision, durability, and purpose. 

The Rolex Explorer is celebrated for its refined simplicity and purposeful design, elements that have remained central to its character since its debut. While the watch has evolved over the decades, it has stayed true to its origins as a reliable tool watch built for extreme conditions. 

Introduced in 1953, the Explorer’s legacy began with its rugged Oyster case, crafted from Rolex’s proprietary Oystersteel. This material ensures durability and corrosion resistance, while the hermetically sealed Oyster case guarantees water resistance up to 100 meters. 

The case’s smooth bezel and balanced proportions make it not only robust but also visually elegant, embodying Rolex’s commitment to merging form with function. 

A hallmark of the Explorer is its iconic black dial with 3, 6, and 9 numerals and cathedral hands. It’s a design built to prioritize legibility in all environments. Rolex’s proprietary Chromalight luminescent material further enhances visibility, offering a brilliant white hue in daylight and an intense blue glow in darkness. 

Complementing the Explorer’s classic design is the advanced engineering behind its movement. Modern models are powered by the Rolex Calibre 3230, a self-winding mechanical movement with a blue Parachrom hairspring, resistant to shocks, temperature fluctuations, and magnetic fields. The patented Chronergy escapement ensures energy efficiency, contributing to a power reserve of approximately 70 hours. 

The Explorer II, an extension of the collection, adds a practical twist for globetrotters and adventurers. Featuring a 24-hour bezel and a brightly colored GMT hand, it allows wearers to track two timezones simultaneously. 

It also swaps out the iconic Arabic numerals for rounded indices and adds a magnified date window at 3 o’clock. This additional functionality enhances the Explorer’s versatility while retaining the rugged spirit of the original. 

The modern Rolex Explorer collection offers much more variety compared to the Tudor Ranger, making it easier to find a piece that suits your personal style and needs. The Explorer 40 and Explorer 36, both in Oystersteel, bring the rugged durability and unmistakable elegance Rolex is known for. 

The 40mm size offers a slightly larger presence, while the 36mm version has a more classic, understated feel which will no doubt attract the wrists of all genders. Both versions feature the iconic black dial with large Arabic numerals, ensuring legibility in any condition. 

For those drawn to a touch of luxury, the Explorer 36 in Oystersteel and yellow gold stands out with its two-tone design. Yellow gold accents on the bezel, crown, and inner bracelet links give it a refined look while still staying true to the Explorer’s functional roots. It’s the perfect blend of adventure-ready and elegant. 

Then, there’s the Explorer II, which adds an extra level of versatility. At 42mm, it’s slightly larger, offering a more substantial feel on the wrist. The 24-hour bezel and GMT hand also provide easy tracking of a second timezone, so it’s an ideal one for travelers. The Explorer II comes with two dial options, classic black or the striking white “Polar” dial, which adds a fresh, bold look to the collection.

Tudor Ranger vs Rolex Explorer – How to Choose 

When comparing the Rolex Explorer and the Tudor Ranger, the most obvious distinction lies in the number of options available. The Tudor Ranger collection is quite limited, with just three models currently on offer, all of which share a similar core design and differ primarily in their strap choices. 

On the other hand, the Rolex Explorer offers more variety, with several case sizes, materials, and even complications to choose from. Although the Explorer collection is still modest compared to some other luxury watchmakers’ vast portfolios, it definitely provides a wider selection than the Tudor Ranger.

Case Sizes and Design

The Rolex Explorer I comes in two case sizes: the Explorer 40 and the Explorer 36, allowing for a more customizable fit depending on wrist size and personal preference. The 40mm size is ideal for those who like a bit more presence on the wrist, while the 36mm version caters to those who prefer a more classic, understated look. 

There’s also a Rolex Explorer II model with a 42mm case, adding even more options in terms of size and presence. In contrast, the Tudor Ranger sticks to a single case size of 39mm, making it more consistent but less versatile for those who like to choose between sizes.

The design of both watches shares some similarities, particularly their clear, legible dials with Arabic numerals at 3, 6, and 9 o’clock. However, the Rolex Explorer typically has a slightly more refined aesthetic, with its signature Mercedes hands and high-end finishes that exude luxury. The Tudor Ranger has a more utilitarian feel, with a more straightforward dial layout and the trademark snowflake hands.

Materials and Durability

The Rolex Explorer uses higher-end materials throughout, such as Oystersteel (a proprietary stainless steel developed by Rolex) and yellow gold options. The Explorer’s case is designed to withstand the harshest environments, and the materials used reflect its robust, luxury tool watch status. 

The use of Chromalight on the dial for improved luminescence is another luxury touch that differentiates it from the Tudor Ranger. Tudor, while owned by Rolex, opts for a more accessible range of materials. The Tudor Ranger uses stainless steel and has a simpler, but still durable, design.

Movement Technology

When it comes to the movements, the Rolex Explorer takes the lead with its sophisticated in-house calibers, such as the Caliber 3230 in the latest models. 

This self-winding movement is renowned for its precision and durability, featuring innovations like the Chronergy escapement for improved efficiency and Parachrom hairspring for resistance to magnetic fields and shocks. It also boasts a power reserve of up to 70 hours, ensuring reliability for long periods without winding.

In comparison, the Tudor Ranger uses the Tudor Caliber MT5402 movement, which is also an in-house automatic movement but one not quite as advanced as Rolex’s latest technology. 

While still offering a respectable 70-hour power reserve and COSC certification for accuracy, it lacks some of the features found in Rolex’s movements, like the proprietary Parachrom hairspring and enhanced escapement.

Complications and Features

The Rolex Explorer II adds an extra layer of functionality to the Explorer collection with its 24-hour bezel and GMT hand, allowing wearers to track two time zones at once. This makes the Explorer II an optimal choice for frequent travelers or those who like having additional functionality in their watches. The Tudor Ranger, on the other hand, stays true to its minimalist design focusing purely on telling the time.

Price and Availability

One of the most significant differences between the Rolex Explorer and the Tudor Ranger is the price. The Tudor Ranger is far more affordable, retailing from around $3,150, making it a great entry point for those who want a robust tool watch without breaking the bank. 

Meanwhile, the Rolex Explorer starts at $7,350 for the base model and can climb as high as $11,000 for versions made from solid gold.

Availability also plays a major role. Tudor Rangers are relatively easier to obtain, with less of a wait time, as they are produced in higher quantities. In contrast, the Rolex Explorer often has long waiting lists, especially for brand-new pieces from authorized dealers. This adds an element of scarcity to the Explorer, which, for some buyers, may make it more desirable.

Which One is Right for You?

Deciding between the Tudor Ranger and the Rolex Explorer ultimately comes down to what you prioritize in a watch. If you value affordability and accessibility, the Tudor Ranger might be the ideal choice. 

Its minimalist design, simplicity, and rugged build make it perfect for those who want a solid, no-nonsense tool watch that doesn’t have the complications or luxury materials of more expensive options.

On the other hand, the Rolex Explorer is for those who appreciate craftsmanship, luxury materials, and the legacy linked to Rolex. It also offers a more versatile collection with different case sizes, materials, and even complications in the Explorer II model, so it’s going to be best suited to those that have smaller wrists, more particular tastes, or just a love of options.

Conclusion

Both the Rolex Explorer and the Tudor Ranger are fantastic tool watches and easily two of the best on the market.  The Rolex Explorer stands out for its superior materials, advanced technology, and wider range of options, making it a top choice for those seeking a luxurious, high-performance explorer’s watch.

Nevertheless, the Tudor Ranger is a fantastic alternative for those who prioritize affordability and accessibility without compromising on durability and design.

While it may lack the refined features of the Rolex, it still offers a rugged, dependable experience, making it the better choice for anyone looking for a great tool watch at a more approachable price.

To Top